7 results for 'cat:"Juvenile Law" AND cat:"Sentencing" AND cat:"Sex Offender"'.
J. Todd finds that the lower court properly dismissed this case concerning defendant’s sentencing for sodomizing another child when he was 15 years old. Although the juvenile court previously denied defendant his right to be free from compulsory self-incrimination by considering his refusal to admit guilt for the criminal offenses, defendant is not entitled to a new juvenile certification hearing because he is now 27 years old and outside of the juvenile court’s jurisdiction. Affirmed.
Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Judge: Todd, Filed On: January 30, 2024, Case #: J-83-2022, Categories: juvenile Law, sentencing, sex Offender
J. Gratton finds that the juvenile defendant's 15-year sentence with 11 years determinate for attempted rape was supported by substantial evidence. His violent, unprovoked and opportunistic crime combined with a presentence investigation report, a psychosexual evaluation, and documents from multiple other psychiatric evaluations show that he presents an extraordinarily high risk of reoffending. Affirmed.
Court: Idaho Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gratton, Filed On: December 11, 2023, Case #: 49994, Categories: juvenile Law, sentencing, sex Offender
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Lazarus finds that the lower court properly sentenced defendant for forcibly raping two women, one at gunpoint and one who was 71-years-old and unable to resist the attack. The court did not sentence him as a juvenile because the conditions under which the rapes took place disqualify them from being considered as juvenile delinquencies. Affirmed.
Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court, Judge: Lazarus, Filed On: July 12, 2023, Case #: J-S17005-23, Categories: juvenile Law, sentencing, sex Offender
J. Halligan finds that the appellate division improperly held that defendant was not subject to restrictions from living near schools after being adjudicated as a youthful offender for rape because the law governing the release of sex offenders states that restrictions apply to anyone "serving a sentence," which includes youthful offenders. Reversed.
Court: New York Court Of Appeals, Judge: Halligan, Filed On: June 15, 2023, Case #: 46, Categories: juvenile Law, sentencing, sex Offender